HAZMAT ROB |
|
Gettin' it?
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
HAZMAT ROB
I wasn't gettin' it and now I am. It is not easy to understand what is happening with the old ConsumerCommodity ORM-D and ORM-D AIR and the new Limited Quantity regulations for hazmatshipments under the 49 CFR Hazmat Regulations. The reason that I say the "old" consumer commoditiesis because, unless you ship in the air mode, you will not be shipping consumer commodities.In the future (after Dec. 31, 2013), you will be shipping your old consumer commodities byground under the new limited quantity exceptions in 173.150-173.156 and still enjoy all the same exceptionsas the old consumer commodities ORM-D.
That's right, the new limited quantity shipments, when shipped by highway, will not need hazmatshipping papers, UN containers, hazard class labels, or proper shipping name and UN/NA identificationnumber marks on the outside container, provided the containers are marked with the new limitedquantity or "LQ" black and white mark without the letter "Y".
You can use the new shipping name ID 8000, Consumer Commodity, Class 9, per the 172.101 HazardousMaterials Table and 173.167; however, this applies "only if you ship by air." Unlike under theold Consumer Commodity ORM-D AIR, starting January 1, 2013, you may use the new ID 8000,Consumer Commodity, Class 9, when shipping 1) Class 2 non-toxic aerosols, 2) Class 3 flammableliquid in Packing Group II and III, 3) Division 6.1 toxic material in PG III, 4) UN3077, UN3082 andUN3175 and again only by air.
Limited quantities have always been and still are authorized in the 172.101 Hazardous MaterialsTable in the column (8A) exceptions. Then, this same exception would "allow" the shipper, if his materialsare "marked" for consumer use (for example, paint, glues, flavorings, extracts), to rename andreclassify their Limited Quantity as Consumer Commodity ORM-D (now in the 172.101 HMT and173.167). Why would a shipper reclassify a Limited Quantity shipment as a Consumer Commodity?To avoid the hazardous materials shipping paper requirements which were at the time still requiredfor the same chemical shipped under the Limited Quantity exception.
If you think you might have trouble with the transition date from old to new, can you mark and labelyour containers both ways? Yes, but only up until January 1, 2014 for ground and January 1, 2013for air. After those dates, you must use only the new shipping information and requirements. I haveput together some shipment examples under both new and old to try and help. DOT outlines this inthe Final Rule issued on Dec. 30, 2011.
For example: 1A would be a Limited Quantity of Class 8 Corrosive under 173.150 using the current(what I am calling the "old") requirements for ground that appear in the 2010 49 CFR with the propershipping name and the UN/NA ID number. 1B shows the new Limited Quantity requirements forground with only the new Limited Quantity mark in the 2011 49 CFR; and if you simply add the new"LQ" mark without the "Y" and leave on the proper shipping name and the UN/NA identificationnumber, you will meet both until 2014. Then if you leave the proper shipping name and the UN/NAnumber, even though it is not required, I don't think you would be in violation.

Example 2A shows the old Consumer Commodity shipment of Class 8 Corrosive (that was authorized in ground and will no longer exist for ground shipment after Dec. 31, 2013) under the 172.101 HMT Column (8A) and 173.150 through 173.156 Exceptions in the 2010 CFR for a Limited Quantity reclassified as a Consumer Commodity, showing the proper shipping name "Consumer Commodity" and the old "ORM-D" mark. Then diagram 2B shows the the new limited quantity mark because the shipping name Consumer Commodity ID8000 and ORM-D (and a combination of both new and old) is not authorized after Dec. 31, 2013 for ground. So the old Consumer Commodity could be shipped as a new Limited Quantity with the new "LQ" mark without the letter "Y". The letter "Y" certifies the shipment is authorized and meets the air requirements in 173.27 (i.e.: smaller containers and lower inner container amounts). With the "LQ" mark on the limited quantity container it would enjoy the old exceptions much like the old Consumer Commodity and shippers would no longer be required fill out and sign a hazardous materials shipping paper when shipped by highway.

Example 3A shows an old Consumer Commodity of Class 8 Corrosive that was authorized in the 2010 49 CFR for both air and ground for hazardous materials in Class 2 aerosols (other than Toxic), Class 3, Divisions 4.1, 5.1 & 5.2, and Classes 8 and 9 that were packaged in the same manner as if they were to be used by consumers per 171.8. Then the same Class 8 Corrosive in 3B is shown as a new Limited Quantity in the air mode after Dec. 31, 2012 because under the new Consumer Commodity ID8000 requirements (173.167), you can not ship Class 8 as a consumer commodity by air.
The old 2010 49 CFR requirements and the old Consumer Commodity ORM-D AIR after Dec. 31, 2012 would not be authorized in the air mode. However, after Dec. 31, 2012 the old Consumer Commodity Class 8 Corrosive could be shipped in the air mode as a new limited quantity with the "Y" LQ mark and the Proper Shipping Name and UN number "Corrosive Liquid Acidic Organic NOS, UN3265 marking, and the Class 8 Corrosive Hazard Label.

For materials authorized under the new 173.167 requirements as Consumer Commodities in the air mode, such as a Class 3, PG II or III, we must look at diagrams 4A and 4B. 4A shows an old Class 3 flammable liquid in PG II (UN1090, Acetone, 3, PG II) shipped as a Consumer Commodity ORM-D Air. Diagram 4B shows that Class 3, PG II shipped as a new Consumer Commodity under 173.167. Here the proper shipping name Consumer Commodity ID8000 is marked as well as the Y Limited Quantity mark AND a Class 9 label.
One more point if you want to try and wrap your head around it. Since the New ID8000 Consumer Commodity Class 9 air shipment has the LQ mark with the letter Y mark on the package (see Diagram 4B) the shipment "could" be shipped by ground as a Limited Quantity. Because the letter "Y" LQ mark is on the container, it could be shipped in both air as a Consumer Commodity ID8000 and in ground as a Limited Quantity. However, since the letter "Y" is indicated on the "LQ" mark, the shipper would be forced into using fewer and smaller inner packagings and you will certainly have to use a few more outer containers to ship the same amount of chemicals because of 173.27 limited quantity inner packaging requirements for air shipments.

If you are "gettin" the the new Limited Quantity and Consumer Commodity regulations you are way ahead of the Hazmat Community and will be in good shape as we move ahead. If not, you still have some time to get it together and understand what is going on. Please call or email us with any question that you might have and we will do our best to help you out.
See also Rob’s Blog titled ORM RIP and the Dec. 30 Final Rule for further information.
Hazmat Rob
|
Call Me...Not
And The Other Shoe Drops
Tuesday, January 3, 2012
HAZMAT ROB
I don’t know if you remember that I wrote in my blog about the new requirement, published in the Federal Register on February, 28, 2011 under the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), that forbids drivers of placarded shipments of hazardous materials from texting while driving the motor vehicle, as adopted under the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) back in September 27, 2010. Well, the other shoe has dropped because in the December 2 Federal Register, the PHMSA along with the FMCSA now (effective January 3, 2012) restrict the use of any hand-held device for both texting and phoning. This final rule does not regulate or in any real depth address “CB” radios or the use of hand held GPS’s.
The final rule states that:
“Texting means manually entering alphanumeric text into, or reading text from, an electronic device.
(1) This action includes, but is not limited to, short message service, emailing, instant messaging, a command or request to access a World Wide Web page, press more than a single button to initiate or terminate a voice communication using a mobile telephone, or engaging in any other form of electronic text retrieval or entry, for present or future communication.
(2) Texting does not include:
Inputting, selecting, or reading a GPS;
Pressing a single button to initiate or terminate a voice communication using a mobile phone or ;
Using a device capable of performing multiple functions (e.g., fleet management systems, dispatching devices, smart phones, citizens band radios, music players, etc.) for a purpose that is not otherwise prohibited in this part.”
And:
“Stops can be avoided by using technological solutions such as a hands-free mobile telephone with a speaker phone function or a wired or wireless earphone. Most mobile telephones have a speaker phone function and one-touch dialing and thus, would be compliant with this rule.”
So what does it mean to drivers of placarded hazardous material shipments? I think that unless the driver has a new smart phone with voice activation, a one-touch calling feature, or an earphone (blue tooth), he will not be able to make a call or text, unless the the vehicle is stopped and no longer moving on the roadway. The preamble states:
“DRIVING means operating a commercial motor vehicle on a highway, including while temporarily stationary because of traffic, a traffic control device, or other momentary delays. Driving does not include operating a commercial motor vehicle when the driver has moved the vehicle to the side of, or off, a highway and has halted in a location where the vehicle can safely remain stationary.”
The penalties can be substantial to the driver and the carrier in lost money and time on the road. Table 2 of Section 383.51 indicates violation could lead to fines and loss of CDL for 60 or 120 days depending on the number and time frame of the offenses.
So, now might be the time to get that new smart phone or blue tooth, or put off that call until you’re at the truck stop. If there is an incident or an accident and the DOT wants to see your phone records don’t be surprised. Or if you run a light or miss an easy pass and your picture is taken on the phone, that might be trouble down the road. I think there might be a market for a cell phone adapter that looks like a CB radio, good buddy. If you have any comments or questions regarding this entry or any hazardous material, hazardous waste, or hazardous substance regulation under The DOT, EPA,OSHA or DHS, please let us know. I hope you have a great new year!
SEE
76 FR 75470 (DEC. 2, 2011)
75 FR 80014 (DEC. 21, 2010)
76 FR 23923 (APRIL 29, 2011)
76 FR 10771 (FEB. 28, 2011)
No phone or texting FMCSR and PHMSA
P.S.: We are working on getting some training modules online. Keep checking our website!
|
Five Fingers of Death Punch
Five pillars of Islam, Five-Card Stud, Five Guys Hamburgers and also the five levels of Hazmat Training under the Department of Transportation 49CFR 172.700 for shippers and carriers of hazardous materials, substances & wastes:
1) GENERAL AWARENESS
2) FUNCTION-SPECIFIC
3) TRANSPORTATION SAFETY
4) SECURITY AWARENESS
5) IN-DEPTH SECURITY
If your company, business, or organization offers or accepts hazardous materials for transportation, every employee who could, in any foreseen or unforeseen circumstance, perform any function under the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) must be trained, tested and certified. OK. That's great, but what do I mean when I say "under the HMR"? Under 49CFR 171.2, it is pretty clear that DOT considers anyone who might identify hazardous materials shipments or determine if a material meets the definition of one of the nine hazard classes outlined in 173.2 to be "under the HMR."
DOT hazmat employee functions also include:
selecting a hazmat container, filling or closing the hazmat container, marking/labeling the hazmat container, filling out or signing the hazmat shipping paper, placarding the bulk container or vehicle, and providing the emergency response information. "Hazmat Employee" includes any person who performs a hazmat function in respect to your company's hazmat security plan and/or loads or unloads hazmat from transportation vehicles.
GENERAL AWARENESS
First and foremost, you must limit the number of employees that carry out these hazardous materials transportation functions. However, every employee must first know and understand what is and is not a DOT hazardous material. They must also understand what job functions are subject to the HMR. When I run our Transportation Skills Programs Hazmat Compliance and IATA Seminars, I always point one thing out. This is that members of IATA or airlines who do not accept hazardous materials cargo in their aircraft must still train, test and certify their employees on the Dangerous Goods or Hazardous Materials Regulations. This is so that employees can identify and then restrict their movement in company aircraft. And I can not tell you how many times I have heard about a salesperson who chose to put a sample of a hazardous material in their checked luggage instead of shipping under all those difficult Hazmat Regulations, not understanding corporate liability.
FUNCTION-SPECIFIC
Unlike General Awareness, function-specific training teaches each employee how to carry out the above hazmat functions. This includes things like how to fill, close, torque wrench, mark, and label a shipping container. It also includes things like filling out shipping papers, placarding, and loading or loading hazardous materials vehicles.
SAFETY TRAINING
You must train hazmat employees on the DOT emergency response information that must accompany shipments, the 24-hour emergency response telephone number on hazmat shipping papers, and the hazardous materials incident notification form and telephone number under 49CFR 171.15 and 171.16.
HAZMAT SECURITY TRAINING
Regardless of whether you trigger the thresholds that require a hazmat transportation security plan, you must still train hazmat employees under the Security Awareness Training. DOT has developed a CD training program to fulfill this component, which we give out in our seminars. However, if your company is required to have a hazmat security plan, then you must also train your employees on YOUR security plan.
Don't let the monumental task of training get the best of you. The gals in my office just converted DOT's fantastic Guide to Developing a Hazardous Materials Training Program, which has been on our website – transportationskills.com for the last few months in PDF form, to a word document. To get a copy of the word version (i.e.: a version you can edit), click on the link below. This will allow you to modify the training documents included with the names of your hazmat employees and print out when the DOT inspectors come around looking for a proof of the five separate hazmat training levels for each hazmat employee.
It may not impress them as much as your five fingers of death punch or a Five Guys hamburger but it sure beats getting fined five times for each of your hazmat employees. Also check out the DOT Pre-Inspection Checklist, the link to which appears below with the DOT Training Guide.
I also want to thank the folks who showed up at my Hazmat Seminars last week in Portland, Seattle, San Jose and San Diego.
I will be out in Chicago, Grand Rapids and Troy next week so call or text me when I get back. You can always call Traci if you have any question or comments.
Developing a Training Program Guide:
Pre-Inspection checklist:
|
Can I Be a Party?
Thursday, October 6, 2011
When you ship hazardous materials by air you are most likely shipping under a Special Permit. The reason that I make this declaration (sorry for the pun) is because of the Shipping Hazardous Materials by Air Seminars that I conduct for my customers who ship dangerous goods by air under the IATA Dangerous Goods Recommendations. We, at Transportation Skills Programs, Inc., tailor many of our in-house seminars to ensure that the participants are trained and tested on the Special Permits they use (and are more widely used than most shippers realize). Case in point, when we tried to buy a UN hazardous material container to use in the air seminar as a training tool, everyone in the office went in search of a container for the air mode. Each and every one of us was directed by the packaging and container companies to the SUPER containers or the SP- containers that a lot of shippers use to ship hazmat by air.
You can ship almost anything in these super containers in every mode - they allow Class 3, Class 4, Class 5, Class 6, and of course, Class 9. These super containers are made up of different packaging components. They have inner packaging bottles with closures, including the tape that is used to secure the tops of the bottles. These then go into bags pre-filled with absorbents and twist tied. The bags are then further put into tin cans that are closed and taped and put into another plastic bag and sealed. They are finally put inside the outer box which is sealed with the pre-supplied tape. These super containers not only pass all the performance oriented packaging standards, they usually exceed the packaging test requirement under the DOT for shipping hazardous material. The hazmat shipper will sometimes find that even though a simple UN 4G/X (4 means box, G means fiberboard and X means Packing Groups I, II, III, see 178.500) specification box in the highway mode is authorized for use in the air mode, they are restricted by the air carriers. For example, some large carriers are notorious for requiring customers shipping toxic or poison Class 6.1 materials to use these SP- or super containers when shipping hazmat by air.
This year, Special Permit grantees (those who apply for and receive the Special Permit) and container manufacturers will find that the special permit application, renewal or application for party status process has become a little more detailed since the Final Rule in the Jan. 5, 2011 Federal Register. For example, an application now requires the name of the CEO of the company that is applying for the special permit. They must include a table of contents and the DOT also wants to know why you need a special permit? How long will you need it for? Did you use it since your company last applied for the special permit (in the case of a renewal)? The locations where the special permit is to be used? How many times was a special permit packaging used? The application must also now include the modes in which the special permit container would be used - air, highway, water and/or rail? Also, the name and e-mail address of a contact person is required. You may also require a registration number under 49 CFR 107.601 (if for example, you ship placardable amounts). These registration requirements include “sufficient information on shipping and incident history, experience and increased safety risks relating to initial application, modification, or renewal of a special permit.” In other words, did the container work or not? The application can now be sent electronically.
Did you know that you can become a party to an application or existing special permit under 49 CFR 107.107 - Application for Party Status. This application includes the information that was required for the original special permit, such as the name of your CEO, the company locations where the special permit will be used, point of contact, e-mail address, your Dun and Bradstreet number and if you have ever applied for the special permit before in the past, you must apply for a renewal under 49 CFR 107.109.
The special permit process has saved time and money for the hazmat shipping community and has helped shippers and carriers to use new packaging material and technologies that might make certain hazmat shipments harder or even impossible under the standard packaging regulations.
If you see an SP- number on a container or hazmat shipping paper, be aware that DOT has stepped up enforcement under “function-specific training” on these unique containers, so make sure to include them in your hazmat training program under 172.700. One of the problems I see with these special permits is that they are often used by individuals who are neither the grantee nor an authorized party to the special permits. A special permit issued for batteries used in environmental monitoring equipment is unlawfully used for shipments of cell phone batteries. That is why the DOT inspectors are looking very closely at the shippers and carriers using a special permit. Like all performance-oriented packagings and UN approved containers, they have detailed closure instructions that must be kept on file with the shipper for at least 2 years for combination (inner and outer) containers and 1 year for single containers from the date the containers last left the facility. Sometimes special permits may also relieve the shipper and carrier from other hazmat requirements, such as shipping papers, labels, placards and even emergency response information.
These containers are special and they require special attention when applying for, becoming a party to or using a special permit container because if DOT finds out that you using a special permit improperly, then the party might be over.
Robert J. Keegan
DOT Special Permit Page
|
You’re Special
Thursday, October 6, 2011
Do your company and employees ship under a special permit? You might be surprised to know there are many shippers and carriers that take advantage of the DOT hazardous material exemptions or special permits. Containers shipped under a special permit will be marked “SP-,” followed by the grantee’s special permit number; and the SP-number will (when required) also appear on the hazardous material shipping paper.
What is a special permit? Well, the best way to explain the special permit process is to remember that packaging under the Hazardous Material Regulations is based on performance standards or testing - drop testing, vibration testing, stacking testing and hydrostatic testing. So if a shipper, who has a unique product because of its size, physical state or even an unusual hazardous waste shipping scenario, can not find an appropriate DOT-approved container, but he can prove a non-authorized container or untraditional packaging is as safe and will provide the same or higher protection in transportation than mandated by Column 8 of the 172.101 Hazardous Materials Table, he can receive a special permit. Special permits can include exemptions for non-specification packaging, forbidden material, reuse of containers and segregation requirements under the HMR.
Before the Performance-Oriented Packaging Standards (POPS) were adopted in the 1980’s, there were a lot more Exemptions (what we now call Special Permits). Before POPS, manufacturing of containers was based on specifications; all containers were the same - same top, same bung and same welds. Many of the old exemption containers passed the new performance standards, and were no longer required to apply for and maintain their exemptions. But situations still exist where an exemption is appropriate.
If you feel that it might be impractical to put your product inside a required container because of its size or physical state, it might be worthwhile to pursue a special permit. An example of this is the 3HT cylinders that have been manufactured and requalified to be used as part of a fire suppression system aboard aircraft under a special permit; however, they must be tested at shorter intervals and different standards than 3HT cylinders that would just be used to ship hazardous material in transportation.
If your containers and/or shipping papers display SP- numbers, then you are shipping under a special permit and you need to make sure that you train and test employees on the special permit requirements, have a copy of the special permit on file and include a copy of the special permit with the shipping paper (when required). Special permits don’t only apply to your containers; they may also included exemptions for the shipper and carrier to forgo hazmat shipping papers, labels, placards, emergency response information and/or other requirements under Subchapter C of the HMR.
In the August 30 Federal Register, DOT published a notice reminding companies that any person shipping under a special permit must be trained, tested and certified on the special permits that they are using, as part of the function-specific training requirement under 49 CRF 172.704. DOT feels that many hazardous material shippers and carriers who use special permits are not being trained, tested and certified on the special permit requirements, creating unsafe transportation scenarios. The Federal Register notice reminds readers that “persons who violate the HMR may be subject to significant civil penalties and/or criminal fines and imprisonment. Maximum penalties may be imposed of up to $55,000 per violation or $110,000 per violation if death, serious illness or severe injury occurs to a person or substantial destruction of property. Potential criminal penalties include fines of up to $500,000 and/or ten years in jail.”
So if you’re using a special permit, make sure that you include that special permit in your training program because DOT inspectors might be stepping up inspections for shippers and carriers who use special permits as a way to improve Hazardous Material Transportation Safety. That means that special permit shippers and carriers might be getting “SPECIAL” treatment or scrutiny when using these innovative and cost-saving special permits.
Robert Keegan
DOT Special Permit Page
|
IT HAS "BIN" GREAT
On July 20, 2011, the DOT finalized some new requirements for consolidation bins, IBCs, Class 9 labels and hazmat incident telephone notification. I thought I would write about some of the changes, to hopefully make it easier to understand and comply. I hope it helps. First, consolidation bins under 49 CFR 172.404(c) are reusable, made of materials such as plastic, wood or metal, and must not exceed 64 cubic feet. They are used by carriers to consolidate, secure against movement and provide additional protection to small packages. Carriers, not shippers, may use the bins, and they can only be used by a single carrier. Packages placed in the bins must be compatible per 177.848. Hazardous materials packages placed inside the bin must be properly labeled and the bin itself must be clearly marked on a tag or fixed display device with an indication of each hazard class or division contained in the bin. Don't confuse consolidation bins with overpacks, which are used by shippers when they decide to enclose one or more DOT specification containers in an outer non-specification packaging, or IBCs (intermediate bulk containers) which are containers over 119 gallons but not more than 973 gallons for liquids or less than 884 pounds for solids, sometimes referred to as totes. Speaking of IBCs, under 172.336 there is a change to the hazardous material marking, labeling and placarding requirements. IBCs are bulk containers and must be placarded on two sides, unless excepted under 172.514(c). The shipper can apply the 4 x 4 inch hazard class labels in place of the placards only for IBCs, not the large (big) bulk containers (over 1000 gallons), that require all four sides of the container to be placarded, and the transport vehicle must display both the hazard class placard and the UN/NA or ID number. This can be displayed on an orange panel or shown inside the hazard class placard as required for bulk shipments. That has not changed. The change under 172.336(d) affects the hazard class placard and/or labels, and marks on the IBC container. Bulk containers do not require the proper shipping name to be marked on the bulk container, unless in rare cases or tank cars and cargo tanks. However, bulk containers are required to be marked on two or all four sides with the materials UN identification number. This is where it starts to get complicated. IBCs must always have the UN identification number marked on the container with the hazard class placard or the label. The best way to meet this requirement would be to use the placard with the UN number inside the placard. You could even use the 4 inch hazard class label with the UN number inside an orange panel or in the square-on-point marking. If a shipper does not display the UN number inside an orange panel, square-on-point or inside the placard, the shipper would now be required to mark the IBC with the proper shipping name of the hazardous material and the UN number, in addition to the hazard class label or placard.
Let's try it a different way. I think there are now 7 ways to mark label and/or placard an IBC container:
- The easiest way is use the hazard class placard with the UN number displayed inside the placard on two opposite sides of the IBC.
- Use the hazard class placard with the UN number displayed inside the orange panel on two opposite sides of the IBC.
- Use the placard with the UN number displayed in a square-on-point on two opposite sides of the IBC.
- Use the hazard class 4 x 4 inch label with the UN number inside an orange panel on two opposite sides of the IBC.
- Use the hazard class 4 x 4 inch label with the UN number displayed in a square-on-point marking on two opposite sides of the IBC.
- Use the hazard class placard with the UN number and the shipping name marked next to the placard on two opposite sides of the IBC.
- Use the hazard class 4 x 4 inch label with the proper shipping name and the UN number marked next to the hazard class label on two opposite sides of the IBC.
Also in this final rule, the DOT has clarified immediate notice of certain hazardous materials incidents in 171.15 to remove the requirement to contact the CDC for incidents involving etiologic agents. (As a side note, please remember the notification time specified in 171.15 is within 12 hours after and incident.) And finally, if you ship class 9 materials don't buy any more class 9 labels unless they are the same as the international labels used under IATA or IMDG. DOT is going to be phasing them in over the next 2 years, so use up your old class 9 labels because under 172.446(c), you have until Oct. 1, 2014 before the new labels must be used domestically. The change to the class 9 labels is very subtle so be careful when you order. Carriers have been using bins for years under special permit SP-14881. IBC containers have always required UN number marking and labels or placards. You have until Oct. 1, 2014 before you need to use the class 9 label domestically, and if you did call the CDC to report a release of a biological substance, you would never be in violation of any regulations, zero. So don't worry about them today. But, tomorrow?
Robert J. Keegan
Transportation Skills Programs, Inc.
|
ORM RIP
For years I was told at the Hazardous Materials & Waste Management Compliance Seminars that the E in ORM-E (other regulated material-E) was for Environmental because it was used for certain EPA hazardous waste shipments, such as soil contaminated with lead shipped for disposal, where lead is present but not enough that it would meet lead’s 6.1 hazard class (very small amounts), but is still a possible carcinogenic hazardous waste, say a DOO8 lead. Later I was told the D in ORM-D was for Domestic because it was used when shipping small amounts of consumer commodities domestically, like nail polish remover (Acetone). Well, this may not be an issue in the coming years because the Department of Transportation is going to remove the last of the ORM’s, Consumer Commodity ORM-D, from the 172.101 Hazardous Material Table. DOT will keep the proper shipping name Consumer Commodity but they will drop the ORM-D in favor of the international recommendations and classify it as Consumer Commodity, Class 9 with a new ID8000 for hazardous materials that are marked and labeled for consumer use when shipped by air after Jan. 1, 2013 (see HM-215K in the Jan. 19, 2011 Federal Register).
WHAT CLASSES AND HOW MUCH?
By Jan. 1, 2013, small containers marked for consumers (see 171.8 - consumer commodity) of Division 2.1 - flammable non-toxic gas (aerosols), Division 2.2 - non-flammable non-toxic gas (aerosols); Class 3 - flammable liquids, PG II & PG III; Division 6.1 - toxic, PG III; and of UN3082 (Class 9), UN3077 (Class 9), and UN3175 (see Special Provision 47) will be authorized for shipment as “ID8000, Consumer Commodity, 9” in the air mode with inner containers not more than 500 ml or 500 gm as listed in 173.167 and as shown in column 9 of the 172.101 Hazardous Materials Table.
WHAT WILL I DO?
Don’t worry. DOT will then take up the slack for the rest of the old consumer commodities by ground as limited quantities, regardless of their use. The biggest change is that not only would packages of limited quantities no longer require proper shipping names & UN number markings, hazardous class labels and UN specification packaging, just like consumer commodities, but a hazardous materials basic description and signed certification shipping paper will also not be required in the highway mode. By excepting limited quantities with the new black and white “limited quantity marking” from shipping paper requirements (ground), and still allowing all the same packaging exceptions as the old consumer commodities, including no proper shipping names & UN number markings, no UN specification packaging, and no placarding on the package, I don’t think we are losing any exceptions. It seems to be more a matter of shipping some of your old consumer commodities as limited quantities, since they too will now not require a hazardous material shipping paper in the ground mode, as long as the package is marked with the new limited quantity marking.
HISTORY
Under DOT, limited quantities and consumer commodities have always been siblings, if not twins. The two have been different only in name and inner packaging quantities as restricted in 49 CFR 173.27(f) and column 9 in the HMT for the air mode. Even the way that they appeared in the regulations is similar. Consumer Commodities were found for flammable liquids in 173.150(c) right after Limited Quantities in 173.150(b). In fact, in 2010 before the new final rule, under DOT regulations, the shipper was given the option of renaming limited quantities (that were packaged and in the same form as a consumer product) as consumer commodities and reclassifying the material as Consumer Commodity ORM-D. In other words, a material had to be a limited quantity before it could be a consumer commodity. For example, “Acetone, Class 3” could be reclassified as “Consumer Commodity ORM-D” if it is in the form of nail polish remover. Hopefully, this new rule will also clear up a common mistake that many shippers make in believing that when classifying a material as a consumer commodity, it must be shipped to consumers. In fact, a consumer commodity does not have to be shipped to consumers; it can be shipped to anyone, and can even be a hazardous waste. When referenced, the definition in 171.8 states they just have to be in a form that would be suitable for consumer use.
THE WAY WE WERE?
Consumer commodities ORM-D have never required hazmat shipping papers when shipped by ground. Because consumer commodities had “Consumer Commodity” and the ORM-D marking on the outer packaging and the inner containers were very small (for example, 1 liter for flammable liquids in PG II) in the highway mode, the hazardous materials basic description and signed certification on the shipping paper were not necessary for consumer commodities. It was only if the material were shipped as a limited quantity that it would have required the hazardous material shipping description with the UN number, proper shipping name, hazard class, packing group and LTD QTY on the shipping papers and the UN number & shipping name markings and hazard class label on the package.
To use an example under DOT domestically before the rule was finalized, acetone could be shipped as a limited quantity in both air and highway, indicated on the package as UN1090, ACETONE, LTD QTY (including class 3 label in air) and on hazardous materials shipping papers as UN1090, ACTEONE, 3, PG II, LTD QTY, provided the packaging and intended use for the acetone was as a solvent. However, if the acetone were marked and packaged as nail polish remover, then the same acetone could be shipped as a consumer commodity with the ORM-D markings on the packaging, but without a hazardous materials shipping paper when shipped by ground under 173.150(c) (as indicated in column 8(a) of the 172.101 Table for the proper shipping name, acetone. The bill of lading (non-hazardous material shipping paper) could simply list the material as nail polish remover when shipped by ground. However, in the air mode the shipping paper and the packaging would require Consumer Commodity ORM-D AIR markings and the Class 3 label.
WHAT’S NEW GROUND?
(SEE FIGURE 1 ATTACHED)
Fast forward to Jan. 1, 2014. Under the final rule (if it remains unchanged), for highway (unless there were an air portion, say, to or from an airport), acetone packaged as nail polish remover could not be shipped to anyone as ID8000, Consumer Commodity, 9, in the ground mode even if the inner container were packaged and marked in a form intended for personal use. The package would not state ID8000, Consumer Commodity with a Class 9 label, instead it would be replaced with the limited quantity marking ONLY on the package. That’s right, in highway it would be shipped with only the limited quantity mark (the new black and white diamond shaped mark without the Y) on the package and just like consumer commodities, no hazardous materials shipping paper, and no shipping name & UN number markings nor hazard class label would be required on the package. You are allowed to use the new black and white limited quantity marking with the letter Y for highway; however, if you did, you would be required to meet the new limited quantity requirements for inner packaging restrictions for air even though the material is shipped by ground. The letter Y on the new limited quantity marking denotes the fact that the material and its packaging meets the more restrictive air regulations including 173.27(f) and column 9 of the 172.101 Hazardous Materials Table.
WHAT’S NEW AIR?
(SEE FIGURES 2 & 3 ATTACHED)
If we switch to Jan. 1, 2013 for air shipments under the DOT, that little bottle of acetone as nail polish remover could be shipped as ID8000, Consumer Commodity with a class 9 label on the package. The shipper must also mark the Consumer Commodity package with the new Limited Quantity mark (the black and white mark with the letter Y) per the ICAO recommendations under packaging instruction Y963. It would also be indicated on the shipping documentation as ID8000, Consumer Commodity, 9 (Class 9 not ORM-D), and with the brand new not UN, not NA, but ID number ID8000. Again, per 173.167 this could only be used for Division 2.1 flammable non-toxic gas (aerosols), Division 2.2 non-flammable non-toxic gas (aerosols), Class 3 flammable liquids PG II, and III, Division 6.1 Toxic PG III and UN3077, UN3082, UN3175 with inner containers of no more than 500 ml or 500 gm and gross weights of not over 30 pounds.
Under this new rulemaking we could also ship acetone regardless of its intended use (solvent or nail polish remover), in the air mode as a limited quantity with UN1090, Acetone, 3, PGII on the shipper’s declaration and on the container as Acetone, UN1090, with the Class 3 label and the new black and white diamond shaped limited quantity marking displaying the letter Y. (The letter Y denoting that the inner containers are prepared for air.)
WHEN DO I HAVE TO CHANGE?
Remember, until Jan. 1, 2014, acetone can still be shipped under the old and still legal requirements in the ground mode, described as either a consumer commodity ORM-D or as UN1090, Acetone, 3, PGII without the new limited quantity marking on the package; but without the new mark, the hazardous materials shipping description on the shipping paper must be UN1090, Acetone, 3, PGII, and LTD QTY would still be required.
Limited quantities have always been allowed to be shipped to anyone regardless of the intended use, and since they will no longer require hazardous materials shipping papers, and still get the labeling, packaging and placarding exceptions, it will be a matter of shipping many of your current consumer commodities in the ground mode as limited quantities with only the new limited quantity marking on the package and no hazardous materials shipping description on your bills of lading.
It looks like the end of the ORM’s. ORM-E was changed to Class 9 years ago and now it seems that same fate has befallen the last of the ORM’s, ORM-D. |
 |
 |

Return to Gettin' it? |
|
|
|
THE FOUR HORSESMEN OF DOT
In the New Testament of the Bible, the Book of Revelation tells of the four horsemen of the Apocalypse - four riders on white, red, black and pale horses. The Department of Transportation has four agencies that regulate the hazardous materials regulations, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) and Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), and they have just added two new weapons to their arsenal to reduce the transportation of containers that may not be identified, marked labeled or packaged properly. The new final rule authorizes federal inspectors and special agents to open overpacks, freight containers and combination packaging to insure the hazardous materials are offered correctly for transportation.
DOT has finalized the rule allowing federal agents to open and/or remove any container or package from transportation for up to 48 hours (or longer) if they have any reason to believe that a packaging or container is not in compliance with the HMR. This rule won’t allow agents to open single containers, only combination packaging, outer packaging, overpacks, freight containers or other packaging that is not immediately adjacent to the hazardous material, in order to inspect the inside of the receptacle or container for undeclared hazardous materials, provided the agent has “reasonable and articulable belief” that the shipment contains hazardous materials or is otherwise not compliant with federal hazmat law or the HMR. If an opened container is found to contain no violations, the package would then be marked by the agent with a statement relaying that fact to future recipients and agents.
To help understand the agents’ procedures, limitations and authority, DOT will make the Agent Operation Manual available to the public on the DOT website. Agents may not open packaging that is prepared properly nor randomly open containers. They may do so only when they have applied certain criteria to the shipment (including, but not limited to, package appearance, conflicting information between the shipping paper and markings on the package, identity of the offeror or carrier, an odor emanating from the container or even anonymous tips. The agent will then determine if the outer package can be opened and will ask the person in possession of the container to open it. If they refuse, the agent may open the outer packaging. The agent would also have the authority to have the package in question shipped back to the shipper, the consignee or a third party facility that could determine if the material is in compliance. If there is no imminent hazard, the agent may return the package to the person in possession for correction of any violations of the HMR and the material may then continue in transportation once all non-compliance issues are resolved without an Emergency Out-of-Service Order being issued.
If the shipment or package poses an imminent hazard to transportation, the agent may issue an Out-of-Service Order and remove the aircraft, railcar, transport unit, transport vehicle, freight container or package from transportation until it is brought into compliance and made suitable for transportation by the offeror or person in possession of the hazardous material at the time of the Out-of-Service Order. This can only occur after written notification of the correction is made to the administration issuing the order.
To issue an Emergency Out-of-Service Order, the agent must have a minimum of two superiors review the order. The agent would be required to notify his first-line supervisor, who would then contact the Headquarters Enforcement Manager and Modal Administration’s Chief Counsel’s Office for consultation on whether the emergency order should be issued. There is an appeal process under 49 CFR 109.17 and 109.19 if the offending party feels the Emergency Order was issued in error.
Since agents nor drivers are normally trained on how to fill and close DOT specification containers, if a carrier employee and an agent were to bring a container back into compliance with the HMR after an enhanced inspection, they would be required to be trained and tested on the requirements for thousands of different containers and the packaging instructions that are kept at the shipper’s location and may not be available to the carrier or the agent. If a package is opened then closed, the person in possession of the material would become the de facto shipper, not just the carrier. Where would the liability fall, on the shipper of the material or the carrier (who may or may not be the person in violation) when a container is offered improperly or is dropped or even mishandled before or after it is offered for transportation?
Since most inspections will be conducted at a fixed facility (the federal government does not, as a rule, set up road blocks or check points), every few shipments, a driver, pilot or engineer would have to open a container in transportation as defined under 49 CFR 171.2. In fact, I could see a driver refusing to accept a container that was opened then closed by an untrained person, public or private, with the possibility of the container failing later in transportation and posing a threat to human heath, the environment and property.
What about the person to whom the package was shipped? Based on his own liability, he might refuse the material in question if the container were damaged during opening for inspection (i.e.: rips, tears or delaminating of an outer package). Since most combination packaging is single-use and may have pre-provided tape, bags, ties, and absorbents, unless DOT contracts with a properly trained and tested third party to correctly open, replace and close one of any of the thousands of different performance-based containers that might be used, then the material could be declared a hazardous waste if refused, and then it would be regulated under EPA. And who is the generator in this scenario?
The focus of the new DOT regulation might companies like UPS, Federal Express, and others, that receive, warehouse, and reship thousands of shipments of hazardous materials every day from non-manufacturing facilities where the materials are in storage incidental to transportation. Think of a hazardous material between the time the material is loaded on a truck and waiting for the driver to remove the material from the facility. This goes back many years to when DOT defined transportation in 171.2. Back then the preamble in the Federal Register stated that even though the carrier may not be present, once the packaging is filled, closed, labeled and marked, the shipper completes the shipping paper and notifies the driver the material is ready for shipment, then at that time the material becomes subject to the HMR.
These four horsemen don’t represent Conquest (white horse), War (red horse), Famine (black horse) and Death (pale horse), but the FAA, FRA, FMCSA and PHMSA are saddling up their riders and they may be riding in your direction.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello Everyone.
As we are nearing the end of the year, we have been looking back at the many of the regulatory changes, both final and proposed, of 2010. It seems that many of them have generated quite a bit of confusion. Thus began our new online feature – “Rob’s Blog,” which examines and attempts to explain these changes. All of the blogs we sent out this year are archived on our website at: http://www.transportationskills.com/RobBlog.html.
We have looked at the new large packagings, reductions in registration fees, new security plan applicability criteria, new emergency response telephone number requirements, new retention of manufacturer’s package instruction mandates, and more. Coming soon will be a new blog on Class 9/ORM-D/Consumer Commodities.
We also want to point out that based on the proposed changes in HM-215K, we will most likely see DOT adopt the international ID8000 Consumer Commodity, thereby phasing out Consumer Commodity ORM-D. We will keep you posted on this.
Thank you all for your continued support, and please check our website often for information on changes coming down the road
| |
Sincerely,
Traci L. Greiss
Transportation Skills Programs, Inc. |
P.S.: We have seminars coming up in Portland Nov. 17 and Seattle Nov. 18. Space is still available if this is in your area. |
|
|
October 31 is not the scariest day of the month, it might be today.
That is if you are not aware of the October 1, 2010 effective date for the new requirement in 49 CFR 172.802(b) requiring identification (by name and title) in the Hazardous Materials Transportation Security Plan of the person who is the senior management official responsible for overall security plan development and implementation.
The final rule instituting this change was published in the March 9, 2010 Federal Register under HM-232F. As of October 1, a senior management official must be “named” who would ensure that the security plan requirements where fulfilled - such as initial and detailed security training, personnel security with background checks, unauthorized access and en-route security. The transportation security plan must be writing and available to inspectors. The plan also must be reviewed and updated at least annually, and employees must be notified of any changes.
That is not the only name that is required as of October 1, 2010 either. There have been some problems with the Emergency Response Telephone Number requirements, concerning who is the shipper of the hazardous material and who is going provide the emergency response information. So you now must ensure that the name of the “person” (see 171.8) offering the hazardous material for shipment is on the shipping paper before, after, above or below the emergency response telephone number, unless the shipper’s name is displayed in a prominent, readily identifiable and clearly visible manner elsewhere on the shipping paper. The telephone number of the hazardous materials shipper must also be on the shipping paper in a location that allows the information to be easily and quickly found and must be displayed in a prominent, readily identifiable and clearly visible manner. For example next to “EMERGENCY CONTACT ***-***-****.”
If you use an “agency or organization” such as CHEMTREC to provide the emergency response information, the shipper may put their contract number with the emergency response information provider in lieu of the company name. This must be located before, after, above or below the telephone number in a prominent, readily identifiable and clearly visible manner. This allows the contract information to be easily and quickly accessed in the event of an emergency. This contract number would be provided to the hazardous materials shipper or hazardous waste generator by the agency or organization that they are registered with who would ultimately provide the emergency response information.
Some people, including myself for many years, believed that if you have a copy of the shipping paper and the information in the Emergency Response Guidebook, you would be able to provide the minimally required information. However, this does not seem to be the case under the October 19, 2009 Final Rule. DOT states that the information should go well beyond the scope of the DOT classification requirements and hazard communication regulations (shipping name, hazard class, subsidiary hazards, packing groups, inhalation hazard zones) and the 2008 Emergency Response Guidebook. 49 CFR 172.604(a) states that “comprehensive emergency response information and incident mitigation information” must be provided by the emergency response information provider.
This makes sense because some international proper shipping names and some UN/NA Identification Numbers are not listed. But it seems that the DOT is really asking the shipper to provide the information that might be found on the MSDS under OSHA. However, DOT also states that a rote reading of the information is not sufficient. This would seem to suggest that the shipper would need to hire an industrial hygienist, chemist and scientist and have them available 24 hours a day on staff to lead emergency response teams though the response or just pay the yearly fee to an “agency or organization” that less that 1% of shippers would ever need to use.
These are not the only new requirements; under a September 30, 2010 Final Rule, the shipper must retain packaging manufacturer’s closure instructions for hazardous materials packaging. In fact, DOT wants a copy of detailed and repeatable instructions for closure of the hazardous materials packaging. These instructions must be prepared by the manufacturer or testing company and sent with each container unless the closure instructions are on the container itself (for example, if they are printed on an inside flap of the container). This can’t just be available to the shipper on a manufacturer’s web site. They must be printable and available to the inspectors. Hazardous materials shippers or waste generators must keep these instructions for two years for combination packaging and one year for single and composite packaging.
October is always scary when you go to see who’s at your door, but this October might be just a little bit scarier if it is someone dressed as DOT inspector.
| |
Robert Keegan
President
Transportation Skills Programs, Inc. |
|
|
LITTLE BABY BIG BULK
What is over 199 gallons, but less than 3 cubic meters or 3000 liters (793 gallons)? A
Large Packaging. No really. They are not new, however, you would have had to get
approval from the Associate Administrator for Hazardous Material Safety to be able
to use one in the past, but not any more. The most important thing to remember is that they
can only be used when shipping hazardous material in Packing GroupIII, the least dangerous
hazardous materials. This would include Combustible Liquid, n.o.s. in Packing Group III or
maybe Hazardous Waste Liquid n.o.s., Class 9 (my favorite Hazard Class), which is also Packing
Group III.
It is not in the old Compliance Guide. We have added 173.36 and Subpart P and Subpart
Q, beginning in 49 CFR 178.900, to the new 2010/2011 Hazardous Materials, Substances and
Wastes Compliance Guide so that you might take advantage of what could be a less expensive
but fully approved DOT hazmat packaging for these materials that pose lower risk in transportation.
Large packagings must be over 119 gallons, however, they cannot be larger than 3 cubic
meters (105 cubic feet). I am no rocket scientist, but this would mean just over 4 feet x 4 feet x
4 feet. “Large Packaging” not Large Container. Why? Because a “packaging” in 49 CFR
171.8 would be a DOT regulated performance-oriented or specification receptacle used to
contain the hazardous material in conformance with minimum packaging transportation requirements.
The word “container” does not even appear in the definitions in 171.8.
A good example would be contaminated soils sent for disposal on a Hazardous Waste Manifest
after a spill or site cleanup work. There are NOT Flammable, Class 3, Corrosive, Class 8
or even Poison, Division 6.1 materials in that soil. But the soil is on a Hazardous Waste Manifest,
thus, DOT regulated not because they meet a DOT definition, but because all hazardous
waste is regulated whether it meets a definition or not. Once a material becomes subject to
the Federal Hazardous Waste Manifest requirements it is a hazardous material under DOT.
This is not to say that you couldn’t ship some flammable, corrosive or even poisonous liquids,
again only in Packing Group III, in large packagings. Based on 49 CFR 173.121- Packing
Groups for Flammable Liquids, the flash point would have to be over 73 degrees. For a corrosive
material, if the material had only the less severe corrosion rate on steel in 173.136 (Packing
Group III) or the material didn’t cause full skin destruction to the skin of the animals tested
in 173.137 before one hour but less than 4 hours of exposure after 14 days of observation (also
Package Group III) could be shipped in a Large Packaging.
Of course there is always an exception and it seems to be with the flexible containers that
can have capacities less than 119 gallons. Flexible packagings may not to exceed the 3000-
liter upper limit, however, they may go down to as small as 15 gallons, and designed and
tested at no less than 50 kilograms or 110 pounds.
So, after October 1, 2010, if you see that your competitor is all of the sudden using strange
and bizarre containers with unusual markings don’t be surprised, they are cheap, legal and
meet all the HMR regulations. |
| |
Robert Keegan
President
Transportation Skills Programs, Inc. |
P.S.: This is not the only change you will see October 1, 2010. Be on the lookout as we will try
and keep you updated in future letters from publisher. |
|
What Goes Down
Do you know what the DOT National Registration Program is? Well, since 1992, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) has collected and used an annual registration fee of up to $1,000 dollars from industry that has allowed PHMSA to gather information about the transportation of hazardous materials and to fund Hazardous Material Emergency Preparedness (HMEP) grants and other activities. These grants provide financial and technical assistance to develop, improve, and carry out emergency plans. The fee is dispersed for the purpose of training hazmat responders, firefighters, and emergency medical service (EMS) providers to allow them to develop emergency response plans, respond to accidents and incidents and to determine flow patterns involving hazardous materials. These activities include training over 2,400,000,000 hazmat responders, conducting almost 14,000 emergency response exercises and 10,000 commodity flow studies, writing or updating more than 55,000 emergency plans and also assisting approximately 1,670 each year (25,059 to-date) local emergency planning commissions (LEPC).
So, under 49CFR 107.601 anyone who offers or transports highway-controlled shipments of radioactive Class 7, explosives 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, over 1 liter of Poison by Inhalation material, containers over 13,248 liters or any placarded shipment, should already know that the company must register with Department of Transportation every year. But, did you know that there is a really good chance that you will have to pay them a lot more starting with the 2011 registration year?
The fee for large companies has gone up considerably from a total of $1,000 last year to $2,600 dollars in 2011. At the same time, the fees for a small business and not-for-profit organizations will stay the same - $ 275. Small business status is defined in 13CFR Part 121. And there is no reason to try to pre-register today with the hope of getting in at the old rate. Forget it, because even those of you who had already pre-registered as far as three years, will be notified and billed the difference between the two fees, which must be paid in full before the new year. This is the same thing that happened the last time the fees were changed. However, then it was the DOT that refunded over $2.3 million when the fees were lowered in 2003.
If you think the fee is too high, don’t expect any pity from the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). They originally proposed large business fee at total cost of $3000, so it could have been worse. In conclusion, the fees stay the same if you are considered a small or not-for-profit business at $275 but if you’re not so classified, you large companies will bear the brunt with the new annual fee of $2,600.
Click here for more information
Robert J. Keegan
Transportation Skills Programs, Inc.
|
|
No More Combustibles?
140 Once, 140 Twice, 140 Three Times
The Combustible Liquid Sanctuary in 173.150(f) in DOT’s 49 CFR for those of you that ship Class 3 Flammable Liquids domestically may soon be gone. Combustible Liquid has been added to the endangered species list, no doubt because it has always been a funny bird. Currently, Combustible Liquid has two definitions in the HMR. In 173.120, it is defined as a liquid that flashes above 140 degrees but below 200 degrees (there is no combustible under the UN, IATA or IMDG). However, there is an exception under 173.150(f)(1) for liquids that flash at or above 100 degrees, which would be considered Flammable Liquid under the UN, IATA and IMDG, to be reclassified as Combustible Liquid domestically. Why would a shipper reclassify from international Flammable Liquid to domestic Combustible Liquid? Because 173.150(f)(2) states that a Combustible Liquid in a non-bulk container is not regulated or subject to the HMR. Thus, allowing those in the know to ship their Class 3 Flammable Liquids, flashing at or above 100 degrees, in non-bulk packaging as non-hazardous material. That may all change soon based on the Proposed Rule published on April 5, 2010. The DOT is requesting comments on modifying or even eliminating the combustible for good. Please read the entire Proposed Rule here.
QUID |
Originated |
February 21, 1970 Flash Point from 80 degrees up to 200 degrees |
|
January 24, 1974 Flash Point from 100 degrees up to 200 degrees |
|
December 21, 1990 Flash Point from 140 degrees up to 200 degrees |
|
April 5, 2010 future unknown |
|
- Should Combustible Liquid be only 140 degrees to 200 degrees?
- Should we keep the current 100-degree to 200-degree Combustible Liquid exception domestically?
- Should Combustible Liquids only kick in at larger amounts such as 3000 L, 1000 gallons, or 3500 gallons?
- Should farmers get a break?
- Should all Combustibles be shipped as Combustible Liquid, n.o.s., regardless of whether it is Paint, Kerosene, or Diesel Fuel?
- Should we develop a Red-letter, white background placard indicating NA1993 for bulk shipments of Combustible Liquid?
|
Now is the time to get involved if you want to save this dinosaur. Comments must be submitted to DOT by July 6, 2010.
Robert J. Keegan
President
Transportation Skills Programs Inc. |
|
|
|
Large Bulk Quantity Containers and the Hazmat Safety and Security Plan
Just when you thought you had your Department of Transportation Hazmat Safety and Security Plan bolted down, the DOT may have just unlatched the door. Your company or facility may no longer require a written DOT Hazmat Safety and Security Plan under 49CFR 172.800 because soon it will only apply to those who offer or accept the following:
Any quantity of Division 1.1, 1.2, or 1.3 explosive material
Any placarded amount of division 1.4, 1.5, or 1.6 explosive material
A “Large Bulk Quantity” of Division 2,1 material
A “Large Bulk Quantity” of Division 2.2 material with a subsidiary hazard of 5.1
Any Poison Inhalation Hazard Division 2.3 or 6.1 Toxic material
A “Large Bulk Quantity” of Class 3 Flammable Liquid PG I and II
A Desensitized Explosive Division 4.1 or Class 3 requiring placarding under 172.504(c)
A “Large Bulk Quantity” of Division 4.2 PG I and II
Any Quantity of Division 4.3 material
A “Large Bulk Quantity” of Division 5.1 PG I and II
Any quantity of an Organic Peroxide Type B, liquid or solid, temperature controlled
A Select Toxin or Agent under 42CFR Part 73 (CDC) or 9CFR Part 121 (Dept of Agriculture)
Any placarded quantity of Uranium Hexafluoride
Highway Route Controlled quantity under the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
A “Large Bulk Quantity” of Class 8 Corrosive in PG I
Yes, the Department of Transportation has come up with yet another Hazardous Materials Catorgory in 49CFR 172.800 Safety and Security Plans, i.e.: “Large Bulk Quantity Containers,” which would cover any container that has a capacity of greater than 3000 kg (6614 lbs) for solids and 3000 liters (792 gallons) for liquids or gases in a single package. This is in sharp contrast to the current Safety and Security Plan threshold which was in 172.800(b), “A quantity of hazardous material that requires placarding under subpart F of this part” as well as select agents, toxins and large Class 9 shipments.
Currently, just one IBC container or “tote” (not more than 3000 liters (793 gallons) but not less than 119 gallons) for shipments of a Flammable Liquid would trigger both the shipper and the carrier to develop a DOT Safety and Security Plan. Under the Final Rule published on March 9, 2010, the shipper and carrier might not have to develop and adhere to a written Safety and Security Plan for that same Flammable Liquid unless a single container exceeded 3000 kg or 3000 liters, or any other amounts listed in 172.800(b) were offered or accepted into transportation.
Under the new requirements, the plan must also include an assessment of transportation site-specific security risks for facilities at which hazardous materials are prepared for transportation, stored or unloaded incidental to movement {171.1(c)(4)) including appropriate measures commensurate with the threat. The plan, in addition to the current components, must also include these new additional elements:
- The job title of the senior management official responsible for development and implementation of the plan.
- Duties for each position or department responsible for implementing and notifying employees when specific elements of the plan are implemented or changed.
- A training plan for training employees in accordance with 172.704(a)(4) and (a)(5).
The plan and a risk assessment must be reviewed and revised, retained in writing and updated annually to reflect changing circumstances. The most recent plan must be available to employees who implement the plan based on security threats, personal security clearance, background checks or need-to-know basis. The plan’s responsible employees must be notified when and how the most recent plan is updated. A copy or electronic file of the plan must accessible and available on request at or through the principal place of business within a reasonable time and place to DOT, DHS or other authorized official.
Some of the requirements to develop and maintain a plan have been relaxed. However, if you are still required to have a plan, then you might want to get stared because the new requirements are effective October 1, 2010, and that is not a lot of time. Don’t think that just because you don’t need a written plan that you’re not required to not carry out Security Awareness Training in 172.704(a)(4). Security Awareness Training must include and provide each Hazmat employee with information on security risks and methods designed to enhance transportation security and to recognize and respond to possible security threats.
Robert J. Keegan
Transportation Skills Programs, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|